Ron Rosenbaum, Writer

May 31, 2009

Wall Street Journal Kicking Butt This Weekend

Filed under: Uncategorized — ronrosenbaumwriter @ 10:56 am

The “weekend” (Saturday) edition of the Journal is no weak sister, the way some Saturday papers are. If I were a Times exec, it would make me worry, make me realize the Journal had a shrewd anti-Times strategy: pick its weakest day, Saturday, and just crush it.

This Saturday’s Journal was a remarkable newspaper. Yes, it’s behind a subscription wall, most of it (I can’t quite figure out what you can get for free and what you pay for–something they need to clarify) but it’s a product– content–that is worth paying for, and gives a little credibility to the paid-content argument.

First there was the big Page One investigative story on the U.S. version of the British parliamentarians’ expenses scandal, revealing little that’s overtly illegal, but–as Michael Kinsley used to say–the scandal is what’s allowed, not disallowed. What’s clear is that someone at the Journal (Rupert himself?) figured out, the day the British scandal broke, that there was low hanging fruit to be had in a story on our Congressional practices. If someone at the Times didn’t have the same idea in the same instant, someone’s lost a step, and if they did have the idea early on, then they were not fast enough to beat the Journal. Not a good sign.

Then there was an amazing story about Pakistan’s nukes, a full-pager by the Brookings’ Institute Bruce Riedel. What was amazing about it was it broke the taboo on stories about Pakistan’s nukes which in the past all tended to accept virtually without question the reassurances of unnamed officials here, and in Pakistan that everything was under control, that the rock solid “loyalist” (to whom?) Pakistani military had them all under lock and key in undisclosed locations. Except many of the locations have been disclosed and can be found on Google maps according to one of my sources. The subhead on Riedel’s piece, a reported essay, flatly states “The security of the country’s nuclear arsenal is shaky.”

Meanwhile the weekend culture section which (full disclosure) I have a lingering fondness for from their rave review of my Shakespeare book, has a contrarian front page essay by P. .J. O’Rourke (“The fate of Detroit,” goes the subhead “isn’t a matter of economics. It’s a tragic romance whose magic was killed by bureaucrats, bad taste and busybodies.”). Plus there are a number of smart book reviews and essays (in addition to the Pakistan full-pager which promises to tell us “What the U.S. needs to avert a crisis”, and delivers a slim wisp of hope based on realism not wishful thinking.)

And then there is my favorite line from Peggy Noonan’s column entitled “Republicans, Let’s Play Grown-Up” on the tenor of the opposition to Obama’s Supreme Court pick.

For those who say use enhanced derogation tactics against Judge Sotomayor to “excite the base”, she says “The base is plenty excited already, as you know if you’ve ever read a comment thread on a conservative blog. Comment-thread conservatives, like their mirror-image warriors on the left…are perpetually agitated, permanently enraged…”

Hmmm. Who’s been saying things like that recently? “Perpetually agitated, permanently enraged” commenters: that rings a bell. (And I’m sure you comment- thread conservatives, at least the cowardly anonymity abusers, will prove us right again). I like the phrase “comment thread conservatives”, it gives new meaning to “base”. And for those who haven’t gotten it, after I’ve repeated it three times, I mean the same goes for comment-thread liberals too–it’s the cowardly anonymity that engenders the “cyber disinhibition”– lowers the IQ (and humanity) on both sides.

Meanwhile you’ve got to think the Weekend Journal has the Times worried. This was an issue which showed the likes of Jeff Jarvis how newspapers “add value”, not that he’d know it when he saw it.

Advertisements

5 Comments »

  1. “Republicans, Let’s Play Grown -Up” on the tenor of the opposition to Obama’s Supreme Court pick.”

    No problem whatsoever. This can be done in a calm and rational manner. Just remember the name of Frank Ricci, and how Sonia Sotomayor put the screws to him. He should be the poster child of the opposition. We also should never forget that most Americans do not support racial preferences. The issue of Sotomayor is a sure loser for Democrats—if handled properly. Lastly Republicans should never behave in the disgraceful manner normally associated with the Democratic Party during the Clarence Thomas nomination and similar outrages.

    Comment by David Thomson — May 31, 2009 @ 11:21 am | Reply

  2. @ # 1

    You are talking to the wall. RR is adamantly obtuse in regard to such remarks as yours, and it’s out of cowardice. He will never, ever respond directly to what you’ve said, or to any others’ critical comments. He can dish out plenty of generalized insults, but face to face on any given point, he’s hopeless.

    Comment by Carl Sesar — June 2, 2009 @ 8:42 am | Reply

  3. Overall, he WSJ has become terribly dull reading under Murdoch and the culture pages stultifying in the regurgitation of received wisdom. Weekend Journal is an egregious dry hump of “the finer things” without a spark of wit or life.

    Comment by charlie finch — June 2, 2009 @ 8:44 am | Reply

  4. Not so long ago the Saturday NYTimes was the best edition of the week, but it was surely the weakest selling, so they scaled it back. The Weekend WSJ is okay, but it’s not as good as, for example, the Saturday Toronto Globe & Mail. And it is still the WSJ, which means that Peggy Noonan and her ilk still infest it. A column about wine and an interesting feature here and there can’t make up for the loathsome politics of the thing.

    Comment by Bill Altreuter — June 5, 2009 @ 12:58 pm | Reply

  5. If you really want to get depressed read the article in Monday’s NY Times about the bitching between Summers, Geithner, Goolsbee, et. al. Described throughout the piece as “brilliant”, they come across as petty, narrowly focused factotums with no orginal ideas to help the country. Ringmaster Obama’s big contribution is to realize that Austin Goolsbee is not in the room during a debate on Chrysler and to buzz him in to join the fracas, fueled by “Diet Cokes in Larry Summers’ fridge.” The problem with America is that we have a superficial, trivial culture based on narcissism and vanity which has filtered into the White House by leaps and bounds since the dullard Reagan. Obama should stop trying to be Reagan with brains and lead the thinking like a Jefferson lecturing Lewis and Clark, rather than succumbing to the reputaions of the meatballs around him. Don’t hold your breath, however.

    Comment by charlie finch — June 7, 2009 @ 7:43 pm | Reply


RSS feed for comments on this post. TrackBack URI

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s

Create a free website or blog at WordPress.com.

%d bloggers like this: